Over the past several years, it has become increasingly apparent that the fitness profession is undergoing a significant shift. Conversations that were once largely confined to academic journals—including skeletal muscle as an endocrine organ, sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, healthy longevity, and more recently the widespread adoption of GLP-1 receptor agonists—have rapidly entered mainstream healthcare. Collectively, these developments have fundamentally changed how clinicians, researchers, and exercise professionals think about body composition, metabolic health, and the aging process. Increasingly, the conversation has moved beyond simply helping people lose weight and toward preserving the physiological reserve necessary to remain healthy, functional, and independent throughout the lifespan (Delanerolle et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025).

For personal trainers, this evolution presents an important opportunity. Historically, our profession has emphasized caloric expenditure, body weight, and exercise prescription as primary markers of success. While these outcomes remain important, preserving and increasing skeletal muscle has become equally central to supporting metabolic health, maintaining functional capacity, reducing chronic disease risk, and improving long-term quality of life. Consequently, helping clients understand how skeletal muscle adapts to resistance training may be just as important as designing an effective training program in the first place (Miranda et al., 2022; O’Bryan et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2026).

This shift is particularly relevant when working with women entering midlife. As hormonal changes associated with the menopausal transition influence body composition, muscle quality, insulin sensitivity, and physical function, many women are beginning structured resistance training for the first time. Although these clients frequently experience meaningful improvements in strength, confidence, and functional performance within the first several weeks of training, visible changes in body composition often occur much later. Consequently, one of the most common questions trainers encounter is not whether resistance training works, but rather how long clients should realistically expect before they begin seeing measurable changes (Isenmann et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2025).

This distinction is more than a matter of curiosity. It represents one of the greatest opportunities personal trainers have to improve long-term adherence. Clients who understand that physiological adaptation occurs in a predictable sequence are far less likely to mistake delayed visual change for a lack of progress. Conversely, clients who expect every adaptation to occur simultaneously often become discouraged during precisely the period when their bodies are responding exactly as intended.

The purpose of this article is to examine what actually occurs during the first several weeks of a progressive resistance training program. Drawing upon recent systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and contemporary evidence surrounding resistance training in midlife women, this first installment will examine why improvements in strength consistently precede visible changes in body composition and why understanding this sequence represents one of the most valuable coaching skills a personal trainer can develop.

Coaching Adaptation Rather Than Prescribing Exercise

Ask a room full of experienced personal trainers why clients discontinue otherwise well-designed programs, and the answers will likely sound familiar. Some clients struggle with consistency. Others encounter competing family or work responsibilities. Occasionally, injuries or unexpected life events interrupt progress. More often than many trainers realize, however, clients simply conclude that the program is not working quickly enough.

From a physiological standpoint, this conclusion is frequently inaccurate.

One of the recurring themes throughout the literature is that resistance training produces a broad spectrum of adaptations during the first several months of training. Improvements in neuromuscular coordination, muscular strength, metabolic health, functional capacity, and movement quality frequently occur before appreciable changes in muscle size or body composition become visually apparent (Liu et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025; Miranda et al., 2022). In other words, the body is often adapting long before those adaptations become obvious in the mirror.

Recognizing this distinction fundamentally changes the coaching process. Rather than evaluating success exclusively through body weight or appearance, trainers begin helping clients recognize the numerous physiological changes occurring beneath the surface. Improvements in exercise technique, increases in training load, enhanced confidence, and greater ease performing everyday activities become meaningful indicators that adaptation is progressing exactly as expected.

Viewed from this perspective, one of the most important responsibilities of a personal trainer extends beyond exercise prescription. We are not simply teaching clients how to perform resistance training. We are helping them understand how the body responds to resistance training so they remain engaged long enough to experience the outcomes they originally set out to achieve.

Progress Is Not a Single Event

One of the greatest misconceptions surrounding resistance training is the belief that adaptation occurs as a single event. Clients often assume that if they are becoming stronger, they should also be building noticeable muscle, losing body fat, and seeing immediate changes in the mirror. While this expectation is understandable, it does not accurately reflect how human physiology responds to progressive overload.

Rather than producing a single adaptation, resistance training initiates a coordinated series of responses across multiple physiological systems. The nervous system becomes more efficient at recruiting motor units and coordinating movement. Skeletal muscle begins remodeling in response to repeated mechanical loading. Connective tissues adapt to tolerate increasing forces, while metabolic pathways involved in glucose regulation, inflammation, and energy utilization also begin changing. Although these adaptations occur concurrently, they do not progress at the same rate (Liu et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025; Valenti et al., 2025).

This concept becomes particularly important when interpreting early progress. A client who has increased her squat by 20 pounds during the first month of training has already demonstrated meaningful physiological adaptation, even if her body composition has changed very little. Likewise, a client who reports climbing stairs more comfortably, recovering more quickly between sessions, or feeling more energetic throughout the day is experiencing important outcomes that extend well beyond aesthetics. Collectively, these improvements reflect the body’s coordinated response to progressive resistance training, even though they may not yet be visible.

For many midlife women, this sequence can initially feel counterintuitive. Years of exposure to weight-centric messaging have conditioned many individuals to evaluate success primarily through changes on the scale or in the mirror. Resistance training often challenges those expectations because performance improvements frequently precede visible changes in appearance. Helping clients understand this distinction early in the coaching relationship can substantially reduce unnecessary frustration and improve long-term adherence.

Why Strength Improves Before Muscle Size

Perhaps no observation surprises new resistance training clients more than how quickly they become stronger. Within only a few weeks, exercises that once felt challenging often become noticeably easier. Clients begin increasing the amount of weight they lift, completing additional repetitions, and performing movements with greater confidence. Understandably, many assume these improvements must reflect substantial increases in muscle size.

Current evidence suggests otherwise.

The earliest improvements in strength are driven primarily by adaptations within the nervous system rather than dramatic increases in skeletal muscle mass. As individuals repeatedly perform resistance exercises, the nervous system becomes increasingly efficient at recruiting motor units, coordinating muscle activation, and refining movement patterns. Consequently, the body becomes better at utilizing the muscle it already possesses before appreciable hypertrophy has occurred (Isenmann et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2025).

This distinction has important practical implications for personal trainers. Early performance improvements should not be viewed as secondary outcomes that simply precede “real” progress. They are the first measurable indicators that the program is working exactly as intended. Celebrating these improvements helps clients recognize that physiological adaptation is already occurring, even though visible changes may still require additional weeks of consistent training.

The literature examining resistance training in middle-aged and older women reinforces this perspective. Across numerous interventions, meaningful improvements in muscular strength consistently occur alongside improvements in physical function, metabolic health, and overall quality of movement. Although changes in body composition often continue developing over longer intervention periods, these early functional adaptations establish the physiological foundation upon which later structural changes are built (Miranda et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2025; O’Bryan et al., 2022).

Taken together, these findings suggest that one of the greatest opportunities available to today’s personal trainer is helping clients redefine what progress looks like during the early phases of resistance training. Rather than waiting for the mirror to validate their efforts, clients can learn to recognize increasing strength, improving movement quality, and enhanced physical function as equally meaningful indicators that their bodies are adapting exactly as they should.

Why the Mirror Is Often the Last Thing to Change

Once clients understand that early improvements in strength are driven primarily by neuromuscular adaptations, the next question usually follows naturally.

“If I’m getting stronger, why don’t I look different yet?”

At first glance, the question seems entirely reasonable. After all, resistance training is commonly associated with building muscle, reducing body fat, and improving body composition. If the body is adapting, it seems logical that those adaptations should become visible relatively quickly.

Current evidence suggests the process is considerably more nuanced.

Although resistance training stimulates muscle protein synthesis following each training session, visible changes in muscle size represent the cumulative result of repeated bouts of mechanical loading, adequate nutritional support, appropriate recovery, and sufficient time. Individual training sessions initiate the remodeling process, but meaningful hypertrophy develops gradually as contractile proteins accumulate over weeks and months rather than days (Isenmann et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2025). Consequently, it is entirely possible—and physiologically expected—for a client to become substantially stronger before appreciable changes in muscle size become apparent.

This distinction becomes particularly important when working with women entering midlife. Hormonal changes associated with perimenopause and menopause influence muscle protein turnover, body fat distribution, and recovery. Although resistance training remains highly effective throughout this stage of life, the timeline for visible body composition changes may differ from what many clients expect. Importantly, this does not indicate that adaptation is absent. Rather, it reflects the normal progression of physiological remodeling occurring beneath the surface (Delanerolle et al., 2025; Isenmann et al., 2023).

From a coaching perspective, helping clients appreciate this distinction may be one of the most valuable conversations that occurs during the first month of training. When individuals understand that visible change naturally lags behind functional adaptation, they become far less likely to interpret delayed aesthetic changes as failure.

Adaptation Is Layered, Not Linear

One recurring theme throughout the literature is that resistance training should not be viewed as producing a single outcome. Instead, it initiates a coordinated series of adaptations that occur simultaneously across multiple physiological systems, each progressing at its own rate.

Initially, the nervous system becomes more efficient. Motor unit recruitment improves, movement patterns become more coordinated, and exercises that once felt unfamiliar begin requiring less conscious effort. At nearly the same time, connective tissues begin adapting to repeated loading, allowing the body to tolerate progressively greater training volumes over time (O’Bryan et al., 2022).

As training continues, skeletal muscle undergoes structural remodeling while metabolic adaptations become increasingly apparent. Recent systematic reviews have demonstrated improvements in insulin sensitivity, glycemic control, inflammatory biomarkers, and overall functional capacity following progressive resistance training among middle-aged and older women, including those living with obesity or type 2 diabetes (Liu et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025; Valenti et al., 2025). These findings reinforce an important concept that extends well beyond aesthetics: resistance training improves multiple physiological systems simultaneously, even though clients often recognize only the changes they can immediately observe.

This broader perspective aligns closely with the principles of Lyon’s (2023) Muscle-Centric Medicine concept outlined in previous installments. Specifically, skeletal muscle should not be viewed simply as tissue responsible for movement or appearance. Rather, it functions as a dynamic organ that communicates with numerous physiological systems throughout the body. Consequently, when skeletal muscle adapts to resistance training, improvements frequently extend to metabolic health, physical function, and overall resilience rather than remaining isolated to increases in muscle size alone.

Helping clients understand this broader definition of progress fundamentally changes the coaching conversation. Rather than evaluating every workout according to whether the mirror has changed, clients begin recognizing improvements in strength, energy, movement quality, and daily function as equally meaningful indicators that their bodies are responding positively to training.

Why the Scale Doesn’t Always Tell the Story

Few tools influence client expectations more than the bathroom scale.

For decades, body weight has served as the primary measure of success within the fitness industry. While body weight certainly provides useful information under specific circumstances, interpreting resistance training progress through this single metric often creates unnecessary frustration.

One reason is that body weight cannot distinguish between skeletal muscle, fat mass, body water, glycogen storage, or other components contributing to overall body composition. Two individuals may weigh exactly the same while possessing markedly different proportions of lean tissue and adipose tissue. Likewise, the same individual may experience day-to-day fluctuations in body weight despite making meaningful improvements in body composition.

Resistance training further complicates this picture. As clients begin lifting weights consistently, skeletal muscle stores additional glycogen to support future training sessions. Because glycogen is stored together with water, temporary increases in total body water frequently accompany the early stages of resistance training. In addition, unfamiliar exercise may produce transient inflammation associated with tissue remodeling. Neither of these responses represents negative progress. Instead, both reflect normal physiological adaptation (Isenmann et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2025).

This issue becomes particularly relevant among women navigating the menopausal transition. Hormonal fluctuations influence body water distribution, visceral adiposity, and overall body composition, making short-term changes in body weight even more difficult to interpret accurately (Delanerolle et al., 2025). Consequently, relying exclusively on the scale during the first several months of resistance training may obscure meaningful improvements occurring elsewhere.

Rather than viewing body weight as the definitive measure of success, trainers should encourage clients to interpret it alongside other meaningful indicators of adaptation.

For example, consider whether the client is:

• Progressively lifting heavier loads.
• Performing additional repetitions with good technique.
• Recovering more quickly between sessions.
• Moving with greater confidence.
• Experiencing improvements in energy throughout the day.
• Sleeping more consistently.
• Performing daily activities with greater ease.

Individually, each of these outcomes provides only part of the picture. Collectively, however, they offer a far more comprehensive assessment of physiological adaptation than body weight alone.

The Muscle-Centric Adaptation Timeline

As I reviewed the literature supporting this article, I found myself repeatedly sketching the same progression in my notes. Although individual studies varied in duration, participant characteristics, and training protocols, the overall sequence of adaptation remained remarkably consistent.

During approximately the first four weeks of training, improvements are dominated by neuromuscular adaptation. Clients typically experience rapid increases in strength, improved movement efficiency, greater confidence performing resistance exercises, and enhanced coordination. Although structural changes within skeletal muscle have already begun, these adaptations are generally not yet visible.

Between Weeks 4 and 8, muscular remodeling continues while connective tissues become increasingly resilient and metabolic adaptations become more apparent. Many clients begin noticing improvements in recovery, exercise tolerance, and overall physical function. Depending upon nutritional intake, training consistency, and baseline training status, subtle changes in body composition may also begin emerging during this period (Isenmann et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2025).

By approximately Weeks 8 through 12, the cumulative effects of consistent progressive overload become increasingly measurable. Improvements in muscular strength continue, while many clients begin recognizing changes in clothing fit, muscle definition, and body composition. Importantly, these visible outcomes represent the accumulation of physiological adaptations that have been occurring since the very first workout rather than changes that suddenly appeared during the eighth week.

Viewed in this context, adaptation resembles the construction of a building far more than flipping a light switch. Each phase depends upon the successful completion of the one preceding it. Neuromuscular adaptations establish the foundation. Structural remodeling follows. Visible changes emerge only after sufficient time has allowed these earlier processes to accumulate.

Understanding this progression fundamentally changes how trainers evaluate progress during the first several months of resistance training. Rather than asking whether clients look different yet, we begin asking a more meaningful question:

Which physiological systems are adapting today that will ultimately produce the outcomes my client hopes to achieve tomorrow?

Measuring Progress When the Mirror Lags Behind

One of the most important implications of understanding the Muscle-Centric Adaptation Timeline is recognizing that no single measurement adequately captures progress during the early stages of resistance training.

Historically, body weight has served as the default outcome measure within the fitness industry. More recently, bioelectrical impedance devices, smartphone applications, and consumer body composition scales have become increasingly popular. Although each of these tools can provide useful information when interpreted appropriately, none should be viewed in isolation.

Body composition is inherently dynamic. Hydration status, glycogen storage, recent training sessions, nutritional intake, sleep quality, and hormonal fluctuations all influence body composition measurements from one assessment to the next. Consequently, short-term changes should always be interpreted within the broader context of a client’s overall progress rather than viewed as definitive indicators of success or failure (Vieira et al., 2016; Yitzchaki et al., 2019).

This concept is especially important for women navigating perimenopause and menopause. Hormonal changes influence body water distribution, regional fat deposition, and metabolic regulation, increasing normal biological variability. As a result, two assessments performed only a few weeks apart may reflect normal physiological fluctuation rather than meaningful changes in skeletal muscle or adipose tissue (Delanerolle et al., 2025; Isenmann et al., 2023).

Rather than relying on a single measurement, trainers should encourage clients to evaluate progress using multiple complementary indicators. Collectively, these measures provide a more accurate representation of physiological adaptation while reinforcing that meaningful progress extends well beyond appearance alone.

Some of the most useful indicators include:

• Progressive increases in training load or repetitions.
• Improvements in movement quality and exercise technique.
• Functional performance during daily activities.
• Circumference measurements collected under standardized conditions.
• Progress photographs taken using consistent lighting and positioning.
• Body composition assessments interpreted over longer time intervals.
• Energy levels, sleep quality, and recovery between training sessions.
• Overall consistency with training and nutritional habits.

Viewed collectively, these measures provide a far more comprehensive picture of adaptation than body weight or body fat percentage alone.

Concurrent Training: Can Clients Still Include Cardio?

As resistance training has become increasingly recognized as the foundation of healthy aging, another common question has emerged among both trainers and clients.

“Will cardio interfere with my strength gains?”

For many years, this question was framed as an either-or decision. Contemporary evidence suggests a considerably more balanced perspective.

Recent systematic reviews indicate that appropriately prescribed concurrent training programs combining resistance exercise with moderate- or high-intensity aerobic exercise can improve cardiometabolic health while preserving the adaptations associated with resistance training (Valenti et al., 2025; Yu et al., 2025; Al-Mhanna et al., 2025). From a practical standpoint, these findings suggest that trainers no longer need to frame resistance training and cardiovascular exercise as competing priorities. Instead, resistance training can remain the foundation of a client’s program while aerobic exercise serves as a complementary strategy for improving cardiovascular fitness, metabolic health, and overall work capacity.

The practical implication is straightforward.

Resistance training should remain the primary stimulus when the goal is preserving or increasing skeletal muscle. However, incorporating aerobic exercise strategically can complement these adaptations by supporting cardiovascular health, insulin sensitivity, and overall work capacity.

Rather than viewing resistance training and aerobic exercise as competing interventions, trainers should consider how each contributes to the broader objective of improving long-term health. When appropriately programmed, the two modalities are often complementary rather than contradictory.

The Coaching Opportunity

Perhaps the greatest lesson emerging from this review is that effective coaching extends well beyond exercise prescription.

Designing an evidence-based resistance training program is certainly important. Selecting appropriate exercises, progressing training loads, and individualizing programming remain fundamental responsibilities of every fitness professional.

Equally important, however, is helping clients understand the biological process they are experiencing.

When clients recognize that increasing strength represents meaningful progress, they become less dependent upon the mirror for validation. When they understand why body composition changes require time, they become less discouraged by temporary plateaus. When they appreciate that resistance training is improving metabolic health, physical function, and skeletal muscle quality long before these adaptations become visually obvious, they are more likely to remain consistent with the behaviors that ultimately produce lasting results.

In many respects, education becomes an adherence strategy.

Every conversation explaining why adaptation occurs in a particular sequence reduces uncertainty. Every discussion about realistic expectations builds confidence. Every opportunity to celebrate performance rather than appearance reinforces behaviors that support long-term success.

For personal trainers working with midlife women, this perspective may be especially valuable. Many clients arrive having spent years pursuing short-term weight loss through increasingly restrictive dietary approaches or exercise programs emphasizing caloric expenditure above all else. Resistance training offers an opportunity to reframe that conversation. Rather than asking clients to become smaller, we are helping them become stronger, more resilient, and better prepared for the decades ahead.

That shift represents far more than a change in programming.

It represents a change in philosophy.

Conclusion

The fitness profession is entering a new era.

As our understanding of skeletal muscle continues to evolve, so too does our understanding of what constitutes meaningful progress. Increasingly, the evidence suggests that resistance training should not be viewed simply as a strategy for improving appearance. Rather, it represents one of the most effective interventions currently available for preserving muscle mass, improving metabolic health, enhancing functional capacity, and supporting healthy aging across the lifespan (Miranda et al., 2022; O’Bryan et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2025).

This perspective has important implications for personal trainers.

Clients beginning a structured resistance training program are adapting from the very first workout. Initially, those adaptations occur primarily within the nervous system as movement becomes more coordinated and strength rapidly improves. Over time, structural remodeling within skeletal muscle, connective tissues, and metabolic pathways continues to accumulate, eventually producing the visible changes many clients originally hoped to achieve. Understanding this sequence allows trainers to recognize progress long before it becomes obvious in the mirror.

Ultimately, helping clients appreciate this timeline may represent one of the most powerful coaching interventions available. Individuals who understand why adaptation unfolds gradually are more likely to remain engaged during the early stages of training, maintain realistic expectations, and continue participating long enough to experience substantial improvements in body composition, physical function, and overall health.

As the fitness profession continues shifting toward a more muscle-centric understanding of health, our role extends beyond teaching clients how to exercise. Increasingly, we are responsible for helping them understand how skeletal muscle adapts, why those adaptations matter, and how consistent resistance training contributes to a healthier, stronger, and more resilient future.

In many respects, that may be one of the greatest opportunities our profession has ever had.

Practical Applications

Personal trainers working with midlife women should consider the following evidence-informed strategies when implementing resistance training programs:

• Establish realistic expectations before the first training session by explaining that improvements in strength generally precede visible changes in body composition.
• Emphasize performance-based outcomes—including strength, movement quality, and functional capacity—during the first several weeks of training.
• Use multiple methods to evaluate progress rather than relying exclusively on body weight or consumer body composition devices.
• Reinforce the importance of progressive overload, adequate dietary protein, recovery, and long-term consistency as essential components of muscular adaptation.
• When appropriate, integrate aerobic exercise alongside resistance training to support cardiometabolic health while maintaining resistance training as the primary stimulus for preserving skeletal muscle.
• Regularly educate clients about the normal sequence of physiological adaptation to improve adherence and reduce unnecessary discouragement.

References

Al-Mhanna, S. B., Franklin, B. A., Tarnopolsky, M. A., Hawley, J. A., Jakicic, J. M., Stamatakis, E., Little, J. P., Pescatello, L., Riebe, D., Thompson, W. R., Skinner, J. S., Colberg, S. R., Ehrman, J. K., Metsios, G., Douda, H. T., Omar, N., Alghannam, A. F., & Batrakoulis, A. (2025). Comparative effectiveness of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on cardiometabolic health in patients with diabesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01909-z

Delanerolle, G., Phiri, P., & Elneil, S. (2025). The “menopause” knockout: A science-backed therapeutic ally and strategy for midlife wellness. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1682887

Huang, G., Wang, G., Zhu, L., & Wang, P. (2026). Effects of exercise intensity and volume on systemic inflammation in overweight and obese postmenopausal women: A dose-response meta-analysis. Frontiers in Immunology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1801309

Isenmann, E., Kaluza, D., Havers, T., Elbeshausen, A., Geisler, S., Hofmann, K., Flenker, U., Diel, P., & Gavanda, S. (2023). Resistance training alters body composition in middle-aged women depending on menopause: A 20-week controlled trial. BMC Women’s Health, 23, Article 513. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02671-y

Liu, R., Shi, X., & Zhang, X. (2025). The effects of resistance training on glycemic control, cardiometabolic health, and body composition in middle-aged and older women with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108691

Lyon, G. (2023). Forever strong: A new, science-based strategy for aging well. Simon and Schuster.

Miranda, F. B., Castro, J. B. P., dos Santos, A. O. B., da Silva, G. C. P. S. M., Nogueira, C. J., Guimarães, A. C., Lima, V., Vale, R., & Dantas, E. (2022). Effects of resistance training on the functional autonomy of middle-aged and older women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics.https://doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-N508

O’Bryan, S. J., Giuliano, C., Woessner, M. N., Vogrin, S., Smith, C., Duque, G., & Levinger, I. (2022). Progressive resistance training for concomitant increases in muscle strength and bone mineral density in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 52(8), 1939–1960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01675-2

Valenti, V. E., Chagas, A. D. S., Chedraui, P., Souza, I. S., Porto, A. A., Sorpreso, I. C., Júnior, J. S. S., Zangirolami-Raimundo, J., Garner, D. M., & Raimundo, R. D. (2025). Effect of combined aerobic exercise and resistance training on postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecological Endocrinology.https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2025.2450338

Vieira, A., Siqueira, A., Ferreira-Júnior, J., Pereira, P., Wagner, D., & Bottaro, M. (2016). Ultrasound imaging in women’s arm flexor muscles: Intra-rater reliability of muscle thickness and echo intensity. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0186

Wang, J., Fan, S., & Wang, J. (2025). Resistance training enhances metabolic and muscular health and reduces systemic inflammation in middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112941

Yitzchaki, N., Kuehne, T. E., Mouser, J., & Buckner, S. L. (2019). Can changes in echo intensity be used to detect the presence of acute muscle swelling? Physiological Measurement, 40(7). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ab122a

Yu, J., Lee, E., Choi, J.-H., Sun, Y., Woo, S., Cho, S., Hwang, D., Kim, S.-W., Kim, J., Lim, K.-Y., & Park, H.-Y. (2025). Effects of a 6-week concurrent training program combining resistance and various modalities of aerobic exercise in obese women with prehypertension: A randomized controlled trial. Metabolites, 15(4), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15040278